"The Great Cap"

By: Hugo Gallo

To the River he lost Paraná many fish and they say that The Refrigerator has them

Me Mister????
Yes Mr.
NOT Mister
Because then who has them???

The Acopiador

Me Mister??
Yes Mister
NOT Mr.
Because then who has them???

The handmade fisherman

Me Mister??
Yes Mister
NOT Mister
Because then who has them???

The Sport Fisherman

Me Mister??
Yes Mister
NOT Mister
Because then WHO HAS THEM??????

"The Great Cap"

Who, as me, they have fifty and I itch, they will remind this game that we made there for the years fifty, and today in the third millennium, this plays that was something in their moment innocent it punishes us with a cruel face:

To discover that all the problems of conservation of the natural resources is not of the fish refrigerators and of the funcionarios que they authorize them to depredate, neither of those acopiadores that also have the authorization of officials of the state, neither of the handmade fishermen that are with the excuse of the social sensibility authorized to kill as many fish as they require it the restaurants, neither of those pseudo-sport fishermen that kill all thing light up of their fishhooks, NOT GENTLEMEN, THE BLAME IS OF..........

"The Great Cap"

And that it is the Great Cap????

It is the covering that protects, the ineptitude, the amiguismo, the desidia, the tip, the disinformation, etc. and it is built by a plot of complicities among some officials that govern turned to the River, some members of the legislative powers that they don't legislate to protect the resources, means that undergo the rule of the state and us they misinform, managers that are authorized to depredate, all that conforms the plot of this Great Cap where they take refuge these individuals that alone you they worry of their peculium and/or of the votes that it will yield them the clientelismo political.

They say that they cannot finish with the mallón for social sensibility, LIE, because the handmade fishermen are the weakest link in the chain, not they have schedule, they don't have holiday, they don't have social covering, they don't have vacations, neither Christmas gift, neither anything of anything.

If the government worries so much in the fight against the work in black there have a working evident sample in black, of exploitation and of indignity.

What they really protect is to those fish refrigerators and to the acopiadores who for the big sums of money that they manage would be under conditions of "contributing" for the campaign, bad it could "contribute" a mallonero that  works for the cookie, the wine and some few ones pesos.

They don't realize these "gentlemen" that if you it finishes the fishing and for consequence the tourism, they will have a social bomb among the hands??? the tourist operators that invested fortunes in services, and on the other hand the handmade fishermen that will no longer have that will to strain of the river come out to protest and not in fact in a peaceful way???.

The saddest thing is that they are not ignorant of the reality, what happens is that they care very little of the future, only them it cares that them reditúa today, and in the coming years that get ready those that be in that moment.

They saw that there is no longer but "Seminars of Fishing Sport"??????????

The "BLUFF" of the "Golden National Fish"

Lately a lot one has spoken of the declaration of the Gilding as National" "Fish that a journalist of present time or of shows  says it it is comprehensible because it is not in the topic, but that journalists say it of  fishes Sport it is, at least, lamentable.

The Gilding was not declared National Fish Fish it was declared of National interest that is not the same thing, and to the goods of their protection this law It doesn't change ANYTHING with regard to the pillaging.

I transcribe them the law 26.021 declaring to the golden "Fish of national" interest, notice that not even know to write the name scientific of the Gilding. (Salminus Maxillosus).

Norma: LAW 26021
Originator: TO BE ABLE TO LEGISLATIVE NATIONAL (P.L.N.)
Summary: Resources ícticos - Declaration of the gilding (Sallminus maxillosus) fish of national interest
Prohibition of the fishing in their natural environment with ends commercial.

Date of Sanction: 16/03/2005
Date of Promulgation: 27/04/2005
Published in: Official Bulletin 28/04/2005
_________________________________
The Senate and Chamber of Deputies of the Nation Argentina gathered in Congress, etc. sanctions with force of Law:

ART.1º - Declares to the Gilding (Sallminus maxillosus) fish of national interest.

Observe that not  declares it to him National" "Fish because this forces them to complete a series of you average and protection measures that are not willing to take.

ART. 2º - you Prohibit you the fishing of the Gilding (Sallminus maxillosus) in their environment natural with commercial ends.

ART. 3º - The Executive Power will adopt the necessary measures for the preservation and the sustentabilidad of the species mentioned in the art.1º.

ART. 4º - The sport fishing and of subsistence it will be regulated by the authority of application of the corresponding jurisdiction.

ART. 5º - The infractions to the prohibition settled down in the art. 2º will be punished with seizure of the copies of the species and ticket that annually it will fix the application authority, which won't be able to be inferior to the quadruple of the amount of the fishing permits fixed for the species.

ART. 6º - Invítase to the provincial governments and of the City of Buenos Aires to to stick to the present law.

This is VERY IMPORTANT, for treaties previous to the National Constitution, the counties they are sovereign of their natural resources, therefore each county is free of to stick or not to this law, undoubtedly none will stick alone, only a agreement interprovincial and international it could achieve that all stick (Missions, Formosa, Currents, Among Ríos, Chaco, Santa Faith, Buenos Aires, City Autonomous of Buenos Aires, it Jumps, Santiago of the Tideland and the Republic of the Paraguay).

ART. 7º - Communicates to the national Executive Power.

GIVEN IN THE ROOM OF SESSIONS OF THE ARGENTINEAN CONGRESS, IN GOOD AIRS, TO THOSE SIXTEEN DAYS OF THE MONTH OF MARCH OF THE YEAR DOS THOUSAND FIVE.

- STOCK OF RECORD UNDER THE Nº 26.021 -

EDUARDO O. CAMAÑO - DANIEL O. SCIOLI - Martha Luchetta - Juan Estrada.


I decree Nº 381/2005
Bs. Ace., 27/4/2005

SEEN former File Nº S01:0113752/2005 of the Registration of the MINISTRY OF ECONOMY And PRODUCTION, the registered Bill under the Nº 26.021 sanctioned by the one HONORABLE CONGRESS OF THE NATION March of 2005, 16 and

WHEREAS CLAUSE:

That the HONORABLE CONGRESS OF THE NATION for the Art.1º of the mentioned Bill in the Seen  has declared from national interest to the denominated species "Sallminus maxillosus."

That the Art.2º of the Bill prohíbe the fishing of the gilding (Sallminus maxillosus) in their natural environment with commercial ends.

That the fishing of the gilding is part of a fishery multiespecífica where you it uses the technique of the "mallón" in fishing" "courts, what gives place to that together with copies of golden are also captured other species of interest commercial as, for example, the sábalo and the surubí.

The Power National executive doesn't mention the espinel, the comb, the duck and the cimbra, that neither they select what they kill.

That, when not allowing such a fishing art, to separate the capture of the gilding of those other species ictícolas, all handling measure should be taken, for to be viable for the group of the involved species.

That for the Art.3º of the mentioned Bill you prevé that the PEN will adopt those necessary measures for the preservation and sustentabilidad of the species mentioned in the first whereas clause, becoming of it that said to Be able to it is who adopts the necessary measures of fishing ordination for the conservation, preservation and sustentabilidad of the species according to that specified in the one Article 41 of the NATIONAL CONSTITUTION.

That the Organization of the United Nations for the Agriculture and the Feeding (CAM) it has established the "Code of Responsible" Behavior dictating those limits and measures of general character for all the countries to goods of to assure the bio-economic objective of the resources.

That the Art.4º of the Bill Nº 26.021 prepare that "The sport fishing and of subsistence will be regulated by the authority of application of the jurisdiction corresponding", at the time that the Art.5º of this norm expires that "Those infractions to the prohibition settled down in the art.2º will be punished with I confiscate of the copies of the species and ticket that annually will fix the application authority, which won't be able to be inferior to the quadruple of the amount of the fishing permits fixed for the species."

That the writing of the articles mentioned in the previous whereas clause, as soon as to their effective application, it would cause competition problems by virtue of it prescribed in the Art.3º of the aforementioned Project, for that that this articles they are objectionable and subject to veto.

This is that the one To be able to National Executive cannot regulate resources that are sovereign of those Counties, since in art. 4º are said that the Sport Fishing and of subsistence it will be regulated by the competent authority (the Counties) and in the art. 5º say that the infractions will be sanctioned by the application authority (those Counties), but the art. 3º delegate in the National Executive Power to adopt the medidas necesarias for the preservation and the sustentabilidad of the species mentioned in the art.1º.

That the measure that intends doesn't alter the spirit neither the unit of the project of law sanctioned by the HONORABLE CONGRESS OF THE NATION.

That the General Direction of Law Matters of the MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND PRODUCTION has taken the intervention that concerns him.

That the present ordinance is dictated in use of the abilities conferred to the POWER NATIONAL EXECUTIVE for the Article 80 of the NATIONAL CONSTITUTION.

In and of itself,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE ARGENTINEAN NATION IN GENERAL AGREEMENT OF MINISTER DECREES:

Art. 1º - Obsérvanse the Art. 2º, 4º and 5º of the Bill sanctioned under the one Nº 26.021.

That is to say that the one To be able to Executive national vein the prohibition of commercial fishing of golden, for the so much thing the relating articles also fall to the regulation of the  fishes sport and of subsistence and the sanctions for the offenders.
It is only in I tweeted that the gilding is "fish of national" interest but to the goods depredatorios doesn't change anything anything.

Art. 2º - With the exceptions settled down in the precedent article, complete you, promulgate you and have you for Law of the Nation the registered Bill under the one Nº 26.021.

Art. 3º - Realizes to the HONORABLE CONGRESS OF THE NATION.

Art. 4º - Communicates, publish you, give you to the National Direction of the Registration Official and file you.

The following it is an analysis of a juriconsult of PescaNet

As they will be able to see this ordinance the Art it vetoes.. 2, 4 and 5 of the law in question, with  helps of professionals, this understands each other this way:

The observations to the Articles that makes it is to annul them automatically. In consequence gentlemen, not you prohíbe the commercial fishing of the gilding, and it is to trial of the Executive Power to adopt the necessary measures for the preservation and the sustentabilidad of the species (art. 3°). The Art's veto. 4° and 5° don't impede that the counties regulate the fishing, since it is a previous ability to the constitution, non delegate expressly and, therefore, as police function it would be necessary to understand it like a concurrent ability of nation and counties.

Now the project returns automatically to the Congress where the legislators they can insist in their original dictation and to vote her again for absolute majority . sew too difficult..

Sincerely I don't have words for this new nonsense; a law is dictated and but there of their improvement the truly important thing is annulled that is the prohibition of the commercial fishing of the gilding; as well as it was the law of intangibilidad of the deposits that went it by the fret and they swindled to half world, this sincerely gives shame; those that really have in their hands to take care of the resources doesn't make it or they make it bad, we would have to make a note taking advantage of this bill so that the sres. legislators return to to insist with the original project, don't they find it?

YES, WE FIND IT.

As they can see, these officials that we knew how to get, continue with the...

Fulbito pa'la Tribune

Here I present them some bonds so that they have a more precise idea of what is happening:

It is a pity that almost any half of Sport Fishing echo is made of this situation, notice that the places previous they are not related with the Sport Fishing, but they denounce this slaughter. Another would be the treatment of the problem if all the related means with the Sport Fishing they committed in this fight, instead of putting to the one air to Jaime Ríos to flatter him for the sanction of a law that doesn't change in anything the pillaging.

It fights that if we participate all it can change the one disastrous destination of the resources ícticos of the River Paraná, for that reason we all should (with our words) to request that  stops with this atrocity, our children and grandsons will thank it to us, or they will reproach.

Hugo Gallo
hugogallo@pescanet.com